Prediction of Roscoe Tanner vs Per Hjertquist Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs P. Hjertquist

Roscoe Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Per Hjertquist

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tanner 1 - 0 Hjertquist

They have played 5 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 3 and Per Hjertquist winning 2. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Per Hjertquist was at the US Open, 31-08-1982, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 2-6 6-1 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	1
Hjertquist	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) US Open(08-31-82)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Per Hjertquist

R. Tanner vs P. Hjertquist H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Hjertquist
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	45.76% (81-96)
1	Hard	0
17	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs P. Hjertquist Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Per Hjertquist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Per Hjertquist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Per Hjertquist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Per Hjertquist winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59). Per Hjertquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 51/62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Per Hjertquist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 1 times and Per Hjertquist being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 3 and Per Hjertquist winning 2.
The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Per Hjertquist was at the US Open, 31-08-1982, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 2-6 6-1 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Per Hjertquist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Per Hjertquist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Per Hjertquist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs Per Hjertquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs P. Hjertquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Hjertquist
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	2
24	Games Won	21
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

P. Hjertquist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jerusalem CH - 15-04-1985
R3 Menno OostingM. Oosting	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Vienna CH - 04-03-1985
R4 Menno OostingM. Oosting	L	3-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Magnus TidemanM. Tideman	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
Geneva - 17-09-1984
R3 Eduardo BengoecheaE. Bengoechea	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Brian LevineB. Levine	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs P. Hjertquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Hjertquist
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	45.76% (81/96)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	45.90% (196/231)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	48.27% (1879/2014)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	41.30% (19/27)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	45.13% (51/62)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	68.75% (11/5)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	604.53
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	33.33% (4/8)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/6)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	60.00% (3/2)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	47.27% (52/58)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (22/22)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (72/158)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	44% (8/18)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (31/55)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (72/61)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (72/11)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (104/20)